1 |
On 20.10.2018 15:19, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: |
2 |
> On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
>> ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch. |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of |
6 |
>> their users better, and it isn't causing problems for anybody else, |
7 |
>> I'm not sure why we should be interfering with this. |
8 |
> That's interesting. If it's not security supported, does that mean we can |
9 |
> simply clean up vulnerable versions and drop every arm revdep to ~arm? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Or are we supposed to keep vulnerable versions around and drop every keyword |
12 |
> except arm? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Either way means extra care for this arch. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
No, keywords status is irrelevant, it is for the security team meaning |
20 |
that they can |
21 |
release a glsa w/o waiting for the stabilization of the security |
22 |
unsupported arches |