Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Offord <d.offord@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] trial software in portage?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:18:27
Message-Id: 9c040ecd0705140909n6f83e68ds119fe6a50651a57a@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] trial software in portage? by Jakub Moc
1 There is a bug report on app-cdr/nero still waiting for the maintainer to
2 update the portage tree, so that the current version of nero actually
3 downloads, rather than its current state of constant 404 errors.
4
5 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172717
6
7 On 14/05/07, Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
8 >
9 > Carsten Lohrke napsal(a):
10 > > On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
11 > >> Uhm, kindly leave app-arch/rar alone; that unrar-gpl thing is just a
12 > bad
13 > >> joke.
14 > >
15 > > There's app-arch/unrar, so this is no point. When unrar-gpl is so
16 > broken, why
17 > > it's in the tree?
18 > >
19 > >
20 > > Carsten
21 >
22 > As the name unrar suggests, it doesn't *pack* stuff, in only unpacks it.
23 > So, thanks and leave the thing alone in the tree; and yeah, there are
24 > really people who work w/ .rar stuff still, tar.{gz,bz2} hasn't
25 > dominated the world yet.
26 >
27 >
28 > --
29 > Best regards,
30 >
31 > Jakub Moc
32 > mailto:jakub@g.o
33 > GPG signature:
34 > http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
35 > Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA
36 > 3D9E
37 >
38 > ... still no signature ;)
39 >
40 >
41 >