Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-emulation/runc/
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:58:41
Message-Id: CAJ0EP41g1d3=UnCr-XzEgg13opfT1CHNWZNgU97VAe+OTr2nvg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-emulation/runc/ by Matt Turner
1 On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
3 >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:16:01AM +0000, Doug Goldstein wrote:
4 >>> commit: 37c1ec7ef31a51206421f03a2df489ec7d7ca244
5 >>> Author: Doug Goldstein <cardoe <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
6 >>> AuthorDate: Mon Dec 7 05:14:50 2015 +0000
7 >>> Commit: Doug Goldstein <cardoe <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
8 >>> CommitDate: Mon Dec 7 05:15:22 2015 +0000
9 >>> URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=37c1ec7e
10 >>>
11 >>> app-emulation/runc: version bump
12 >>>
13 >>> bump to latest upstream release.
14 >>>
15 >>> Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe <AT> gentoo.org>
16 >>>
17 >>> app-emulation/runc/runc-0.0.5.ebuild | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
18 >>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
19 >> You did not update the Manifest or use repoman, and thus blocked the
20 >> rsync tree.
21 >>
22 >> I fixed it now.
23 >
24 > This is happening with some frequency. Could we install a server-side
25 > git hook that prevents pushes if an ebuild is added without a Manifest
26 > change? It wouldn't have to verify anything more than that to catch
27 > nearly all of these problems.
28 >
29
30 That would not work for ebuilds which do not have any distfiles
31 associated with them.

Replies