1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 "Alex Tarkovsky" |
6 |
> <alextarkovsky@×××××.com> wrote: |
7 |
> | This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo |
8 |
> | developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1]. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Even that aside, if a couple of hundred developers can't handle doing |
13 |
> QA for all those maintainer-wanted ebuilds, what makes you think four |
14 |
> people can? |
15 |
> |
16 |
Really now Ciaran, if you have issues with those people. Take it up |
17 |
with them. You've yet to state a reason why it concerns you. Its no |
18 |
better then the people who are saying that it'll be a huge QA issue |
19 |
but they are not elaborating on it. As some are aware and some are |
20 |
not, the basic job I do for gentoo is a QA one. I help to ensure the |
21 |
x86 arch tree is hopefully as stable as possible. So if anything this |
22 |
will affect me directly. I however want to see what the project can |
23 |
do. If it does end up as a problem then it can be killed off, but |
24 |
doing so before it has a chance to fly is part of what has been |
25 |
keeping us from innovating as a distribution. It means we're maturing, |
26 |
but we are still a community project and as such should be allowed to |
27 |
fly with possibly wild idea's when it suits us. |
28 |
|
29 |
As well, we are all human, as you are Ciaran. This means that we make |
30 |
mistakes. However, what you are also asking is to NOT trust those |
31 |
people who are qualified to be part of gentoo to be able to do the |
32 |
work and perform it in a decent way. I will not begin to doubt any of |
33 |
the people who have the gentoo flag as part of who they are because of |
34 |
being human. As has been said as well, we learn more from the mistakes |
35 |
we make then somehow having avoided it without realizing why. |
36 |
|
37 |
Thirdly, I know one of the issues with one of the leaders of the |
38 |
project, is the fact that they are not a ebuild developer. I'd like to |
39 |
have them take the second quiz simply to prove that they have the |
40 |
knowledge to be trusted to review the ebuilds. Course with the number |
41 |
that he's seen I'm sure he's helped take care of things that would |
42 |
make the rest of us go...how did they think that was ever a good idea. |
43 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
44 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) |
45 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
46 |
|
47 |
iD8DBQFEzY0sSENan+PfizARAu2kAJ488MHWDCtFY8SKetoC1wxFtpPk7wCfW97W |
48 |
DxJvWeVcd87OukymD/M+Crs= |
49 |
=kdC9 |
50 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |