| 1 |
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:39 +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 12:41:51 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger: |
| 5 |
> > On Monday 29 October 2007, Bertram Scharpf wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 08:47:28 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger: |
| 7 |
> > > > while that sucks, it still does not make it appropriate for this list |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > As I wrote in the first post the problem appeared when I |
| 10 |
> > > upgraded from glibc-2.5-r4 to glibc-2.6.1. At this point of |
| 11 |
> > > time I was not able to decide whether the problem was |
| 12 |
> > > Gentoo-specific or not. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > the context of "not appropriate" is not "this list" as in "Gentoo specific", |
| 15 |
> > but as in "this list is for development, not support" |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I may venture to assume that repetitive error messages of |
| 18 |
> that plenty could be seen at least as a documentation bug. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Which should be filed as a bug report or sent to the gentoo-doc list. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 24 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 25 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 26 |
Games Developer/Foundation Trustee |
| 27 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives