| 1 |
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:31:57 -0700 |
| 2 |
Greg Turner <gmt@×××××.us> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Anyhow, isn't the gentoo-x86 tree already plenty big enough, without |
| 5 |
> every single overlay's ebuilds and eclasses in there too? Personally, |
| 6 |
> I'm inclined to wish it was smaller, even if that meant more stuff was |
| 7 |
> pushed into overlays |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Actually, this is something I expected to happen soon after we got |
| 10 |
overlays but for some reason it haven't. I imagine we would |
| 11 |
not have a single gx86 official tree but rather a bunch of official |
| 12 |
overlays. For basic installation one would need just the system |
| 13 |
overlay. Then everypony could add official overlay for KDE, or gnome or |
| 14 |
whatnot as one desires. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I haven't thought this through in any way but it feels like better |
| 17 |
design. |
Archives