| 1 |
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 02:20:48 -0500 |
| 2 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> The EAPI=0 document was supposed to be a QA project. What it is now, |
| 5 |
> I have no idea. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
A QA subproject which has not yet released a public draft. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> What the Council is interested |
| 10 |
> in is a specification of expected behavior of an EAPI=0 compatible |
| 11 |
> package manager. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Which is exactly what PMS is. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> We asked for a specification. If the PMS |
| 16 |
> team is unable or unwilling to provide us with what we asked under |
| 17 |
> the terms we asked for it |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
We're working to provide it. So far, I haven't been asked for it under |
| 20 |
any particular terms other than "at some point in the future, and we |
| 21 |
realise that it will take a while to finish". |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives