| 1 |
On 23 September 2013 08:14, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 21/09/13 08:21 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 09/21/2013 08:44 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> El sáb, 21-09-2013 a las 14:42 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 8 |
>>>> I don't have time for it for a long time (since I switched to |
| 9 |
>>>> official suspend time ago and moved back to gentoo-sources |
| 10 |
>>>> then), updated patches are periodically generated and put at: |
| 11 |
>>>> http://tuxonice.nigelcunningham.com.au/downloads/all/?C=M&O=D |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> Feel free to get it if you want |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>>> It goes with tuxonice-userui |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Is any of this really needed anymore? I suspend/hibernate/resume |
| 20 |
>> with gentoo-sources and hardened-sources.... Does it really make |
| 21 |
>> sense to hold on to tuxonice still? |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> -Zero |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Admittedly I haven't looked into this, but I believe tuxonice-sources |
| 27 |
> is still required if you wish to use a hibernation file rather than a |
| 28 |
> swap partition. There are numerous other features to, iirc, that |
| 29 |
> users may want that the kernel just doesn't offer. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Tux-on-ice patches are also included in pf-sources, so those who want |
| 34 |
it can get it that way. Then we may not need to maintain separate |
| 35 |
tuxonice-sources. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Cheers, |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 42 |
Gentoo developer |
Archives