Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:33:01
Message-Id: CAJ0EP42XE3cBgyy9eRtWQzcHZxiy=CLsNf126Y4_G=VBQkMq3g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass by William Hubbs
1 On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > All,
4 >
5 > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from
6 > go-module.eclass.
7 >
8 > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa
9 > warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM.
10 >
11 > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
12 > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
13 >
14 > Thoughts?
15
16 It seems like you're being very lazy about this. At a minimum, you
17 should do the following:
18
19 1. Search for affected packages.
20 2. Contact the maintainers, possibly via bug reports.
21 3. Give them a some time to convert their packages.
22 4. Mask any packages that do not get updated.

Replies