| 1 |
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:23:20 +0000 Markus Rothe <corsair@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 4 |
| > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:36:18 +0000 |
| 5 |
| > Markus Rothe <corsair@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
| > |
| 7 |
| > > Personaly I find it a little bit annoying to write changes twise. |
| 8 |
| > > One time in Changelog and one time in --commitmsg. How about |
| 9 |
| > > using the commitmsg for Changelog as default, but if a Changelog |
| 10 |
| > > entry already exists, then write nothing to Changelog. |
| 11 |
| > |
| 12 |
| > I'm sure you can manage to write a bash function to call echangelog |
| 13 |
| > and repoman commit with the same message. |
| 14 |
| |
| 15 |
| Sure, I can and the other mail shows that it is *realy* simple, but |
| 16 |
| why should every dev write his own "script", when this could be done |
| 17 |
| once for all? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Isn't this one of those things that's best done on a per-dev basis? |
| 20 |
It's so trivial there's no point shipping an app that does it -- |
| 21 |
reading the associated documentation would take longer than writing |
| 22 |
your own. Plus that way you can incorporate personalised clever things |
| 23 |
such as auto keyword messages for arch teams |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
| 27 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 28 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives