1 |
So years ago, we had GRP (the Gentoo Reference Platform.) My understanding |
2 |
of USE=bindist was that when building packages whose binaries were illegal |
3 |
to distribute, the build system would take some action. For instance, for a |
4 |
while we were not allowed to brand a source build of firefox as firefox, so |
5 |
debian made iceweasel and we ourselves add USE=bindist so we could build |
6 |
custom builds and replacing the branding. |
7 |
|
8 |
I'm not sure RESTRICT=bindist actually does anything. My guess is that the |
9 |
intention of the restriction is to warn users that when building binaries |
10 |
packages of a given package, there are 'legal issues' with such |
11 |
distribution. That being said, as some have noted in the thread, the legal |
12 |
issues are diverse and are unlikely to be covered in one flag. |
13 |
|
14 |
-A |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
18 |
|
19 |
> Currently RESTRICT=mirror and RESTRICT=bindist are independent of each |
20 |
> other. I wonder if the former should imply the latter. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Is there any package where the files in SRC_URI cannot be mirrored |
23 |
> (i.e., redistributed), but where the built package can be distributed? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Ulrich |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |