1 |
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:03:36 +0200, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: |
2 |
> > |
3 |
> > Now for the exciting (but time consuming) news: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > The road to a stable TeXLive in Gentoo: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > 1. Stabilize tetex-3.0_p1[3]. We are almost done, there are very few |
8 |
> > real bugs left, and tetex-3.0_p1 is already much more stable than |
9 |
> > tetex-2 ever was. I hope this will happen in the next month. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> This is long overdue - again if I can help please let me know. I use |
12 |
> this all the time and have been doing so for the last year. Do you have |
13 |
> a stabilisation tracker bug set up for this yet? |
14 |
|
15 |
Yes, see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124511 |
16 |
|
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > 3. Create a TeXLive ebuild and put it onto ~arch and have ~arch user |
19 |
> > switch over. |
20 |
> > This requires us to figure out how to create a texmf-tree. In the past |
21 |
> > Thomas Esser created a very solid (although containing rather old |
22 |
> > versions) texmf-tree with packages taken from ctan[5]. |
23 |
> > There are several possibilities: |
24 |
> > 3.1 Create our own texmf-tree (can largely be automated by scripting). |
25 |
> > 3.2 Use MikTeX package manager[6] which was ported to Linux. |
26 |
> > 3.3 Use something similar to the g-cpan.pl script used by perl, to |
27 |
> > install packages from ctan[7]. |
28 |
> > I haven't evaluated the possibilities yet, but comments are more than |
29 |
> > welcome! |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> I would favour option 3.1 personally, and it would be great to keep our |
32 |
> LaTeX packages more up to date as I sometimes have to manually update |
33 |
> these packages. |
34 |
|
35 |
I agree, but the question is to see how far we can automate the process. |
36 |
CTAN is a really large database and even the MikTeX package manager has |
37 |
only a fraction of it. |
38 |
|
39 |
Regards, |
40 |
/Alexandre |
41 |
-- |
42 |
Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature. |