| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:32:55AM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:22:35 -0500 |
| 3 |
> William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > All, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Mostly because of the recent "trustless infrastructure" thread, I am |
| 8 |
> > wondering why we are still distributing the portage tree primarily |
| 9 |
> > via rsync instead of git? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Can someone educate me on that, and is it worth considering moving |
| 12 |
> > away from rsync distribution? |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Thanks, |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > William |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> because: |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> 1) it is still the most bandwidth economical means of distributing the |
| 22 |
> tree |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Even more so than http or https? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Thanks, |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
William |
Archives