| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:21:14 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against |
| 5 |
> libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the dep entirely (because you didn't |
| 6 |
> notice?), there's a new package you should convert to using: |
| 7 |
> sys-libs/binutils-libs |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> this supports subslots & multilib and is sane to depend on unlike binutils |
| 10 |
> where you can have multiple versions installed or active versions selected. |
| 11 |
> -mike |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
What about stable packages? Since binutils-2.25.1-r1 is stable, |
| 14 |
binutils-libs-2.25.1 should be stabilized as well and I have a |
| 15 |
package which needs this (dev-util/oprofile). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives