| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 09/29/2012 05:50 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 29/09/12 11:45 AM, hasufell wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>> There isn't so much a problem with the current |
| 9 |
>>> python-distutils-ng eclass but rather it's to expand it to a |
| 10 |
>>> more comprehensive replacement for both distutils and python |
| 11 |
>>> eclasses. In order to do that efficiently, most of the core |
| 12 |
>>> functionality should be moved so that the new distutils is more |
| 13 |
>>> like a wrapper to the new python. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>>> This could certainly be done by patching the existing eclass, |
| 16 |
>>> but mgorny wants to use new eclass names instead of keeping the |
| 17 |
>>> current one. Hence the rename. I think that's about it.. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>> In that case we are missing 95% of the features of |
| 21 |
>> python.eclass. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Aha, but do we really -need- 95% of the features? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Yeah, maybe not. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
But that should be discussed beforehand imo. So that we really design |
| 29 |
this eclass together. Otherwise I fear we will end up getting a 4th |
| 30 |
implementation... |
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQZxmzAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzi2AIAKQjjlbuf8K3TUFGmXPldTi4 |
| 36 |
sQJhwZjo4sngQF1zql4K2RJHnx2R6qsr/YteZ/4ek2yTg356oqkMjAyk5BV5Dpv8 |
| 37 |
shJugkgvAd3iZWVOUqQEMjxl+Rd3wRmgAw5oC+EEXrck6vOOgQbla/RdLwYFstkP |
| 38 |
5Pmp+0hnksRcAnGhOiw7W0JLBJzuhPjoeUGdXVVVwuaPIzlgis0Jv8fSMeP4jxpT |
| 39 |
vM5EOuvrwpM+gJzkpH0ABCdVHMyigufXCKED11JOrRTUA1fgT2XoWBMCblBoMXtH |
| 40 |
e6WzUT5NojLlHn4E3psqy3kA4bqzRdMm6u3Iw4bPLFnl0vUaCGYqVfvL1OYkTU4= |
| 41 |
=gbNx |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives