1 |
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:38:09PM +0200, Alex Alexander wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +0000, Markos Chandras wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: |
4 |
> > > On 10/30/2010 08:10 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: |
5 |
> > > > If i remember it right, the server profile was created for those people, who only want a minimum |
6 |
> > > > amount of default profile enabled USE flags (so no desktop profile because of that), but on the |
7 |
> > > > other side dont want to do the additional work/checks/reading for hardened profiles (which have much |
8 |
> > > > less profile enabled USE flags, but also have the special gcc, glibc and Kernel), basicly a profile, |
9 |
> > > > which does the same as hardened profile without the specific hardened bits. |
10 |
> > > > |
11 |
> > > > |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > Isn't this essentially what the default profile is? Basically server is |
14 |
> > > just default + USE="apache2 ldap mysql snmp truetype xml". |
15 |
> > Well it shouldn't be like that. And if the default profile is pretty |
16 |
> > much the same as the server one, then please consider removing the |
17 |
> > server profile as it makes no sense then |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Please don't. The fact that there are only a few changes doesn't make it |
20 |
> useless. Also, you'd be forcing all users currently using the profile to |
21 |
> migrate without any real reason. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> -- |
24 |
> Alex Alexander | wired |
25 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer | Council / Qt / Chromium / more |
26 |
> www.linuxized.com |
27 |
|
28 |
You are missing the point here. My intention is to make server profiles |
29 |
more "generic" for server usage and not optimised for ldap/web hosting |
30 |
services |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
36 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |
37 |
Key ID: 441AC410 |
38 |
Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 |