Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Package version requiring sse
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:38:58
Message-Id: pan.2005.08.07.13.34.27.960607@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package version requiring sse by Ivan Yosifov
1 Ivan Yosifov posted <1123410491.29945.3.camel@××××××××××××.net>, excerpted
2 below, on Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:28:11 +0300:
3
4 > On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 12:11 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
5 >> On Sunday 07 August 2005 12:03, Ivan Yosifov wrote: Well ppc doesn't
6 >> have SSE
7 >
8 > Then why is the ppc keyword there ?
9
10 Well, he said, but those accustomed to only thinking x86 might have missed
11 it, the way it was worded... that ppc uses different software code in that
12 section, code which presumably takes care of its own ppc specific issues,
13 so the sse-only issue only applies to x86 (and amd64, but since all of
14 those have sse, that means only x86 has the issue since only on it is sse
15 required but not all hardware provides it).
16
17 --
18 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
19 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
20 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
21 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
22
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list