| 1 |
On Friday 15 July 2005 09:02 am, Kristian Benoit wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 20:13 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > By the way, you seemed to attach a unified diff between your modified |
| 4 |
> > portage and an empty directory. Please don't do the same for busybox. |
| 5 |
> > Sending a 1.4MB patch to a public mailing list is not very nice - |
| 6 |
> > especially not in one go. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'm sincerilly truly sorry, I'll try to triple check in the futur. |
| 9 |
> I just can't believe what I did. |
| 10 |
> I ran the same command and here's the output ??? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
live and learn; do it again and we take your fingers |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > Patches belong on bugs.gentoo.org anyway. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Sorry, I'm getting use to the LKML. |
| 17 |
> As I sent a bad patch, I'll send the correction here, but I'll send |
| 18 |
> patch in bugs.gentoo.org in the futur. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
other than the fact the bash coding style needs to be fixed up, the idea is |
| 21 |
pretty sound i think ... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
perhaps the better list to hammer this out is gentoo-portage ? |
| 24 |
-mike |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives