1 |
William Hubbs posted on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:03:57 -0600 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:53:59PM +0000, Duncan wrote: |
4 |
>> William Hubbs posted on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:23:07 -0600 as excerpted: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> There are reasons to run the rc binary directly; this is how you |
7 |
>>> should be changing runlevels. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> ??? |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> init 9 (or telinit 9, yes, I have a runlevel 9, basic, just gpm as it |
12 |
>> happens) isn't appropriate? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Well, I have to qualify what I said. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> There are two "runlevels" you have to worry about. |
17 |
> The OpenRC runlevels are named; you can switch between these using rc |
18 |
> directly, for example: |
19 |
> |
20 |
> rc default |
21 |
> rc single |
22 |
> rc nonetwork |
23 |
> |
24 |
> The sysvinit runlevels are the numbered ones, and these are mapped to |
25 |
> things to run, like 3 is mapped to /sbin/rc default. I believe runlevel |
26 |
> 3 is mapped to other things in inittab, so, I guess the best answer is, |
27 |
> it depends on what you are wanting to change. Does that make sense? |
28 |
|
29 |
Yes, it does. Thanks. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
33 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
34 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |