| 1 |
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:21:59 +0100 |
| 2 |
Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:01:00 +0100 |
| 4 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > >>>>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > > Sure it does - it defaults to :* when :* was never specified. I |
| 8 |
> > > don't see how defaulting to :0= is a "policy" any more than :* is. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Defaulting to :* is just the long term behaviour from EAPIs 0 to 4 |
| 11 |
> > when no slot operator was specified. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Which section in the PMS is this specified? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
It's not, exactly. Paludis treats :* and "no slot specified" |
| 16 |
differently. The former allows for runtime switching of slots. The |
| 17 |
latter assumes "we don't know which slot it needs, so to be safe we'll |
| 18 |
have to assume it could be any of them". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives