| 1 |
Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug |
| 3 |
> 116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals |
| 4 |
> need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a |
| 5 |
> particular arch. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Shouldn't it be the reverse? Rather, they need to go stable if anything |
| 8 |
depending on them is stable. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
IOW, it doesn't matter if an ~arch virtual depends on stable packages. |
| 11 |
It matters if stable packages depend on an ~arch virtual. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Thanks, |
| 14 |
Donnie |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives