| 1 |
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger: |
| 6 |
> > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > So why on earth are we applying a random patch that upstream is not |
| 8 |
> > > > using |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > not everyone uses glibc, and glibc *is* moving in this |
| 11 |
> > > direction. Gentoo |
| 12 |
> > > is simply accelerating the change ... otherwise glibc will take |
| 13 |
> > > longer to do the actual migration. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > You don't need to break everyone's ~arch for dubious glibc benefits, |
| 16 |
> > which could be done by a p.masked version and a tinderbox run. |
| 17 |
> > I am not your tinderbox dummy having to waste time on this to maintain |
| 18 |
> > my own ~arch stuff. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> i waited until the known bugs died down. i don't have access to a |
| 21 |
> tinderbox system myself. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Cut the nonsense. You clearly didn't even test that glibc version |
| 24 |
on a single system. If you did, you'd notice the core system packages |
| 25 |
failing to build. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Best regards, |
| 29 |
Michał Górny |
| 30 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives