| 1 |
On 17/05/06, Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:57:51 +0100 |
| 4 |
> "George Prowse" <cokehabit@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > So good working practice is to introduce a variable where breakages |
| 7 |
> > could come from two directions rather than stick with what works? Let |
| 8 |
> > the project mature before asking for changes from the Gentoo side. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That paragraph makes no sense. I don't see what you're trying to say. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
What it is saying is why introduce anything or change anything just for your |
| 14 |
package? Why introduce the possibility of a problem on either the program or |
| 15 |
the tree side? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So far you have failed to give one proper reason for why a change should be |
| 18 |
made. |
Archives