| 1 |
On Thu, 23 May 2013 05:30:25 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> That's the point. It *IS* possible to use INSTALL_MASK sanely, |
| 5 |
> without something breaking. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Nobody said it isn't, I agree hacks can be used without breaking |
| 8 |
things; the point is that that doesn't make it a good idea in general. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Applying your exact phrasing to the topic at hand: "If you really |
| 11 |
> think[1] you can't use INSTALL_MASK without something breaking, you |
| 12 |
> should carefully consider who is doing the screwing up." |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If you really think[1] you need INSTALL_MASK for a few small files when |
| 15 |
there are much larger consumers around, you should carefully consider |
| 16 |
whether what you are doing is the right thing. ("OMG systemd units!") |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> [1] Think: Or for that matter, demonstrate to yourself and others. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
With kind regards, |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 27 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 28 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives