1 |
On Saturday 25 March 2006 12:42, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: |
2 |
> If you're suggesting CVS as the second VCS (i.e. in addition to SVN) |
3 |
> then I don't see the point - SVN is simply a better CVS and clients |
4 |
> should be available on the alt platforms. |
5 |
No, I was just stating the fact that cvs in itself is cheap wrt dependencies. |
6 |
I try to avoid using it myself if I haven't to. |
7 |
|
8 |
> Language issues aside, it makes sense to support a distributed VCS in |
9 |
> addition to SVN, as that would provide a useful alternative. |
10 |
Acknowledged. I find it useful myself, the only problem I see is, as I said, |
11 |
that darcs is not as cheap as cvs or svn, or even as bazaar-ng and mercurial, |
12 |
wrt dependencies. |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
16 |
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |