1 |
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:44:24PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:35:51 +0100 Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> > > I find it amusing that no-one complaining about this has actually |
6 |
> > > asked to see it. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > I think ferringb did, just not very successfully. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Not so far as I've heard... |
11 |
|
12 |
Well, stop hitting the pipe. |
13 |
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46163 |
14 |
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46178 |
15 |
|
16 |
Quoting, |
17 |
> ciaran |
18 |
>> harring |
19 |
| Doing it formally, I hereby request access to PMS specifically with |
20 |
| the intention of going over it to spot where it differs from long |
21 |
| standing portage behaviour. |
22 |
And as you know all too well, given your behaviour on every previous |
23 |
discussion we've had related to this, you're not getting it. |
24 |
|
25 |
Two angles on the behaviour BS; either related to the fact I'm dead |
26 |
set on the spec reflecting portage behaviour, and being finished, or |
27 |
it's related to the fact the paludis devs generally speaking would be |
28 |
the first group of folks lining up to kick me in the balls. |
29 |
|
30 |
Which... frankly, hey, whatever. Put up with the taunts/name calling |
31 |
(not like I have much of a choice mind you), only thing I'm after is |
32 |
ensuring the spec gets done right. If the council has y'all doing it, |
33 |
then I have to deal with you guys (whether I like it or not :) |
34 |
|
35 |
~harring |