| 1 |
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 17:40 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:27:50AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Most of the profiles under default-linux have a ChangeLog at the |
| 5 |
> > > architecture level. If you make *any* changes to a profile, you should |
| 6 |
> > > be putting your changes in the ChangeLog. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Just wondering, any objections if we add ChangeLogs at the rest of the |
| 9 |
> > levels in profiles? Would esp. be useful for some of the more global |
| 10 |
> > changes. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Not really. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Personally, I'd prefer there not be ChangeLogs any deeper on |
| 15 |
> default-linux than $arch, so adding one to, say, default-linux would be |
| 16 |
> good, adding one to default-linux/x86/2006.1 would be rather pointless. |
| 17 |
> I could definitely see the use of having one on base and default-linux, |
| 18 |
> for sure. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> I'll leave it up to other projects (hardened/embedded/etc) if |
| 23 |
> they would want to follow suit, but it definitely makes Release |
| 24 |
> Engineering work much easier having it. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
No objections. TBH we don't really have to edit those profiles often. |
| 27 |
We/I try to keep them as static as possible. When they do change it's |
| 28 |
usually cuz somebody has some brilliant idea for some non linux which |
| 29 |
forces all other profiles to update to mask or unmask some use flag. |
| 30 |
We/I tend to request that they update it themselves. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
But note taken. If I have to edit something I'll try to remember to |
| 33 |
add a ChangeLog entry. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 38 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives