Re: OT Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists

[R0b0t1]

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:57 PM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@×××××.com> wrote:
>> 2017-12-08 2:43 GMT-05:00 R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com>:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote:
>>> > On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>>> >> Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read.
>>> >
>>> > I hope you really mean that, we've all heard you complaining about this
>>> > too many times already.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Inasmuch as a random person is likely to care, glancing at the
>>> messages shows wltjr is the more convincing of the parties involved.
>>> Having actually wasted time trying to figure out what is going on
>>> there is no mention of what ever happened from Gentoo that indicates
>>> anything improper took place.
>>
>> Single-point samples are not really representative.
>>
>> The messages wltjr sent and the bugs/PRs/etc he linked convinced me in
>> quite the contrary, at least, about the legitimacy of the current
>> actions.
>>
>
> I am having trouble understanding you, unfortunately. It seems like
> you agree with his removal from the list. I suppose that is okay,
> originally I just tuned the conversations out because they were noisy.
>
> The summary I have tried to provide is: despite the fact wltjr does
> not seem to have a filter, he has so far not actually been incorrect.
> The developers involved, on the other hand, have been contradicting
> themselves since I first saw this around 2013. At some point they
> appear to have provided him an "out" and would have let him apologize,
> but he wants an apology from them.
>

Buried in his messages there are apologies, but the sticking point
seems to be that he fails to recognize the original actions as
reasonable.