| 1 |
[2019-10-28 11:12:49+0100] Hanno Böck: |
| 2 |
> There are a bunch of dev-erlang/* packages whose primary reason for |
| 3 |
> packagin is that they're dependencies of ejabberd (and they're becoming |
| 4 |
> more), most of them currently in maintainer-needed status. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I'd like to group those together as maintained by an ejabberd project |
| 7 |
> and a corresponding mail alias. (And hopefully in the long term won't be |
| 8 |
> the only person being in that Project.) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Ejabberd |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Wouldn't a Erlang project be better, specially as there is the Perl and |
| 13 |
Python projects which are there for probably the same reasons? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Also saying this from a Elixir (language which borrows a lot from Erlang, |
| 16 |
like it's VM, librairies and fault-tolerance) developer point of view |
| 17 |
which tried to package pleroma few months ago in my overlay, there is a |
| 18 |
bunch of shared dependencies and I'm pretty sure there will be more |
| 19 |
Elixir applications in the wild. |
Archives