1 |
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:16:42 +0000 |
2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > From my limited look at the code I've done so far in the small bit |
5 |
> > of repoman work on the Portage team, as detailed in another mail I |
6 |
> > just sent to you on this ML, I wouldn't consider it as a problem |
7 |
> > just now. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > We for example have /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/eapi.py to easily |
10 |
> > deal with it, it's just that such checks would drop in that file and |
11 |
> > across the Portage source code when the versions listed in those |
12 |
> > checks are no longer used. It's currently reasonable to have this |
13 |
> > amount of checks, but imagine it growing to what you would need for |
14 |
> > 10 versions; that'd be a different story, but perhaps it is too |
15 |
> > early to wonder about this now. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Removing EAPIs doesn't help you: you still need to be able to |
18 |
> uninstall things. |
19 |
|
20 |
There aren't much checks left if you only need to cover that. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
With kind regards, |
24 |
|
25 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
26 |
Gentoo Developer |
27 |
|
28 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
29 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
30 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |