1 |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 +0000 (UTC) |
3 |
> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted: |
6 |
>> > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs |
7 |
>> > commit twice with cvs. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already |
10 |
>> pointed out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything |
11 |
>> but. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with |
14 |
> the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone. |
15 |
|
16 |
I didn't interpret it that way. cvs commits are just kind of |
17 |
expensive, even without repoman doing checks. |