1 |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò posted |
2 |
<200506281255.41021@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.org>, excerpted below, |
3 |
on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:55:35 +0200: |
4 |
|
5 |
> And until you don't figure on roll-call after taking a quiz, you can't |
6 |
> be considered "Official Staff/Developers", so you can't just say "we're |
7 |
> official", also ATs getting developers must take the quiz, so you see |
8 |
> that the quiz *is* a fundamental part of it. |
9 |
|
10 |
FWIW as a prospective AT myself... The current amd64 AT requirements, at |
11 |
least, require taking not only the "staff" quiz, but the full ebuild quiz, |
12 |
so it's NOT just ATs becoming devs, but ALL (at least amd64) ATs, AND |
13 |
it's the full ebuild quiz the devs must pass. (I can't say about other |
14 |
archs, but there's only one such non-amd64 AT so far, on ppc64, and I |
15 |
wouldn't be surprised if he had to take the full ebuild quiz as well.) |
16 |
|
17 |
>From the amd64 AT documentation: |
18 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml?part=1&chap=1 |
19 |
|
20 |
<quote> |
21 |
Prospective AT's will have to pass the ebuild quiz, currently here. |
22 |
</quote> |
23 |
|
24 |
("Here" points to the ebuild quiz |
25 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/quiz/ebuild-quiz.txt ) |
26 |
|
27 |
Further to the point made elsewhere, but without the source reference, |
28 |
further quote from the first link above: |
29 |
|
30 |
<quote> |
31 |
A note about arch testers "status": Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Testers are not |
32 |
official Gentoo developers. They are, however, a recognized part of the |
33 |
Gentoo/AMD64 arch team. I ask that all AT's keep this in mind when |
34 |
selecting email signatures or other forms of communication. |
35 |
</quote> |
36 |
|
37 |
So, yes, ATs take not only the staff quiz, but the full ebuild quiz. |
38 |
Further, the expectation is clear that they will be held to "professional" |
39 |
conduct standards. For me, that will probably mean giving up my |
40 |
references to "MSWormOS", at least if and when I choose to identify |
41 |
myself as an AT. |
42 |
|
43 |
On the thread subject... |
44 |
|
45 |
It seems to me there's really not a lot of controversy, only the sides |
46 |
keep talking past each other and making it more than it is. |
47 |
|
48 |
Both sides seem to agree that moderators of individual forums shouldn't |
49 |
have to take the quiz, eliminating the problem of the i11l forums ESL |
50 |
(English-second-language) mods. |
51 |
|
52 |
Only the global mods and admins would have to take it, and they all know |
53 |
English pretty well as a defining characteristic of their job, so the |
54 |
requirement to take the quiz (and know English well enough to communicate |
55 |
decently in the Gentoo staff community) shouldn't be an issue. |
56 |
|
57 |
Further, many of the global mods are already staff/devs, and of those that |
58 |
aren't, there are only three who haven't said they plan on taking it |
59 |
anyway, and two of those are inactive. |
60 |
|
61 |
Thus, the whole debate is over one person, who has expressed a reluctance |
62 |
to take it but has said (s)he will if necessary. |
63 |
|
64 |
IMO, that makes it pretty much a non-issue. If the global mods wish to |
65 |
make that position official Gentoo staff, and vote among themselves to do |
66 |
so, there should be no exceptions. If the one (or either inactive) |
67 |
global-mod who has concerns chooses not to take the quiz, simply make that |
68 |
person a individual forum moderator, but just list every forum in the list |
69 |
of forums they get mod rights in, thus effectively making them a global |
70 |
mod in all but name, which, if global-mod is to now mean Gentoo staff and |
71 |
they haven't become Gentoo staff yet, is effectively what they'd be anyway. |
72 |
|
73 |
OTOH, the global mods, now seeing what it would mean, and that many |
74 |
already have staff/dev status anyway, could actually decide they don't |
75 |
want or need Gentoo staff status as part of the global mod description |
76 |
after all. They could remain as they are. It would be perfectly |
77 |
reasonable for one or more global mods to change their vote out of respect |
78 |
for the single individual that has expressed reluctance, and to rescind |
79 |
the GLEP before official vote of the existing Gentoo staff and devs on it. |
80 |
Things would continue as they are now, and any individual global mod, as |
81 |
anyone else, could still become a Gentoo dev or Gentoo staff member |
82 |
independently. |
83 |
|
84 |
So... I don't have a vote, but I'd vote yes on a GLEP that made the |
85 |
forums a Gentoo project and required the global moderators to become |
86 |
Gentoo staff -- assuming of course they didn't decide they didn't want |
87 |
that, after all. No exemptions for individual global mods, but no |
88 |
exemptions needed, because most are or have expressed an intention to |
89 |
become staff anyway, with only one person expressing reservations, and if |
90 |
that person chooses not to, they effectively simply become an individual |
91 |
forum mod, who happens to have mod rights in /every/ individual forum, so |
92 |
nothing's lost but the name, IMO a fair sacrifice to the democratic vote |
93 |
to become staff, considering there's always the choice to take the test |
94 |
and get back or keep the global mod label as well, if (s)he so chooses. |
95 |
|
96 |
-- |
97 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
98 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
99 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
100 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
101 |
|
102 |
|
103 |
-- |
104 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |