| 1 |
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:39:42 +0100 |
| 2 |
Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> The wrapper is already in a seperate package [1], the currently active |
| 4 |
> and tested version (1.0) is in bash, also there is a (currently |
| 5 |
> masked) version 2.0 written by binki in C doing the same natively. So |
| 6 |
> you even have a choice in what to use. :-) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Good and not so good: We don't really have a choice, for portability we |
| 9 |
need a C version otherwise shebangs are broken with older linux kernels |
| 10 |
and non-linux platforms. ( Do you remember the python-wrapper mess? :) ) |
| 11 |
It'd be nice to have a well tested C version. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Alexis. |
Archives