Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:58:26
Message-Id: 4452AB79.9050104@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union by Chris White
1 Chris White wrote:
2 > On Friday 28 April 2006 04:14 pm, Ryan Phillips wrote:
3 >> I disagree. By committing something to the current tree it has the
4 >> ability to effect a lot of people. What happens when we need to reverse a
5 >> commit? It isn't that easy with CVS.
6 >
7 > cvs admin -or1.1
8 > (delete revision 1.1)
9 >
10 > cvs admin -or1.1::1.2
11 > (delete revision 1.1 - 1.2)
12
13 If you have to use admin commands to fix a mistake, the system is
14 broken. However in this particular case it is unnecessary, you just need
15 to make use of the merging features.
16
17 cvs update -j 1.2 -j 1.1 oldfile
18
19 Thanks,
20 Donnie
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list