Archives
Archives
| From: | Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category | ||
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:33:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGbUWSLAd45Nejo-wyY8DY1hW=i69o5KEAjNKo9O3mhmnBY8wg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category by Chris Reffett |
||
| 1 | 2013/1/17 Chris Reffett <creffett@g.o>: |
| 2 | > but I think dropping the qt- prefix |
| 3 | > will lead to overly generic/already existing package names: "gui" |
| 4 | > "declarative" "dbus" "core" "opengl" etc. I don't see any value from |
| 5 | > dropping the prefix that would justify this. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | +1. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Georg Rudoy |
| 11 | LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org |