Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] office-ext.eclass
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:58:36
Message-Id: CAB_Kkxw6wkPgxpnwM=x5EW=4jj1kZNDoBxBuype5GZKR+GjKFg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] office-ext.eclass by "Tomáš Chvátal"
1 2011/8/29 Tomá¹ Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o>:
2 > Dne 29.8.2011 10:24, Maxim Koltsov napsal(a):
3 >>
4 >> No reason, i just like backaward compability :)
5 >>
6 > But this is not backcompat this will be completely new and the packages that
7 > will be added never were in main tree :-)
8
9 Oh yes, you're right. I just feel some kind of sadness when old things
10 pass away :)
11
12 > local ext=$1
13 How about extensions with spaces, if there are any?
14 > einfo "Remember that if you replace your office implementation,"
15 Maybe @ooo-ext-rebuild set would be useful?
16
17 And you use 'libreoffice' in comments and 'openoffice' in function and
18 variable names. Why?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] office-ext.eclass "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>