Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets | ||
| Date: | Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:32:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080928213219.66a30341@snowmobile | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:21:18 -0700 |
| 2 | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Does this seem like a good approach? Are there any suggestions for |
| 4 | > improvements or alternative approaches? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Strikes me as a good way of causing extreme confusion for users... |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Consider sets in package.use, for example. Any specified flags should |
| 9 | apply to the entire set. But what about set-property packages? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Sets and packages aren't the same thing, and shouldn't be treated as if |
| 12 | they are. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |