From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.51_pre10: QA Notice Messages | ||
Date: | Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:23:13 | ||
Message-Id: | 200406111623.04542.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.51_pre10: QA Notice Messages by Paul de Vrieze |
1 | On Friday 11 June 2004 04:11 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
2 | > Hmm. That doesn't make it easier does it ;-). What about two eclasses. One |
3 | > that accomodates conditional use, and the other which pulls in all the |
4 | > automatic dependency mumbojumbo. |
5 | |
6 | so now we duplicate most of the eclasses just to work around a portage |
7 | limitation ? ;) |
8 | -mike |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |