Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Max Kalika <max+lists.gentoo-dev@×××××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] libxml++ ebuild
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 06:42:28
Message-Id: 920706609.1046645043@[192.168.23.5]
1 I just noticed that libxml++ 0.21 went into portage. I had a look at this
2 ebuild to compare it to:
3
4 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14121
5
6 I'm curious on a few points:
7
8 1) Why hardcode an SF mirror instead of mirrors://sourceforge
9 2) Whats the use of src_compile() which only contains econf and email -- I
10 thought that was default?
11 3) Can the src_install() be augmented with the two dosym()s as described in
12 #14121 attachment #7892? Some apps look for libxml++.a and by default
13 libxml++ installs libxml++-1.0.a (at least version 0.20 did).
14
15 Thank you. I suppose #14121 can also be marked closed.
16
17 ---max kalika
18 --max@×××××××××.edu
19 -lsit systems administrator
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list