| 1 |
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 16:39:29 +0200 |
| 2 |
Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > As much as I hate the weird || ( use ? ( ) ) and empty block rules, |
| 4 |
> > it would be worse to have them apply in some situations but not |
| 5 |
> > others. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Indeed, makes sense. Would it also make sense to have some more |
| 8 |
> logical meaning in a future EAPI ? I mean, in every context I've ever |
| 9 |
> seen, applying a rule to the empty set is the neutral of that rule, |
| 10 |
> so that it preserves associativity. |
| 11 |
> That'd mean: || ( ) is false, && ( ) is true, ^^ ( ) is false, ?? ( ) |
| 12 |
> is false. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The sensible thing to do is ban it, and additionally ban use? ( ) |
| 15 |
inside || and ^^ (if we've not done that already...). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives