Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash

[James Broadhead]

On 12 March 2012 22:37, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote:
>
> Can somebody present a real ( or even theoretical ) problem that could
> arise from having the EAPI in the filename that isn't some abstract
> hand-waving?
>
> Not trying to be a troll here, but really, I still haven't seen any.

This isn't a real-world problem, but we're arguably over-loading too
much information into the filename already;
- package name
- package version
- ebuild revision
- (EAPI?)