| 1 |
On 2002.10.22 00:17 cycloon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 15:25, Spider wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Well, here's my take on it: |
| 4 |
> > new sub-branch packages ( 2.0.1 to 2.0.2) will get the ~arch KEYWORD |
| 5 |
> > tagged to them, and then after a week or so when the testing is done |
| 6 |
> on |
| 7 |
> > a wider base, will drop the ~ and become "stable" . |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > For the new branch 2.1.x which is highly unstable alpha software |
| 10 |
> you |
| 11 |
> > will still have to dig in package.mask if it ever will be in. why |
| 12 |
> you |
| 13 |
> > ask? Because once again we will have to re-check all our gnome 2.0.x |
| 14 |
> > packages to not depend on the 2.1 / 2.2 libraries. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> looks like debian/*BSD-like branching comes to gentoo. Extreme nice. |
| 18 |
> Go on devs |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I couldn't agree more! Theirs is a development model that I can |
| 21 |
definately agree with. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Gentoo is looking better everyday. That, with the binary reference |
| 24 |
platform mentioned in Daniel's article on O'Reilly's, are gonna put |
| 25 |
Gentoo on servers which is great. I have said it numerous times. |
| 26 |
There is more to Gentoo than just being source based. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Evan. |
Archives