Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: lists <lists@×××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos]
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:39:56
Message-Id: 1386434385.16533.5.camel@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] by Lars Wendler
1 Lars Wendler schreef op vr 06-12-2013 om 16:24 [+0100]:
2 > Hi list,
3 >
4 > in [1] we got a bug where was pointed out that it is impossible to use
5 > =net-fs/samba-4* on a system which has dev-libs/openssl[kerberos]
6 > installed.
7 >
8 > Long story short, samba-4 hard requires app-crypt/heimdal while
9 > openssl[kerberos] hard requires app-crypt/mit-krb5. Of course both
10 > packages are mutually exclusive as both are their own kerberos
11 > implementation.
12 >
13 > The bug reporter suggests to use bundled heimdal from samba-4 which I
14 > would like to avoid if possible.
15 > If anyone knows some better solution please speak up. It is highly
16 > appreciated.
17 >
18 > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/490872
19 >
20 >
21 > Kind regards
22 Hi Lars,
23
24 how about enabling the existing mit-krb5 support in Samba? Patch
25 attached to the bug report.
26
27 regards,
28
29 Jorg