1 |
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 08:52:42PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > Cloning the repo [1] takes 200seconds on 8cores (it's 2GB of data and |
4 |
> > 22 minutes of 3.4GHz cpus). |
5 |
> As others have pointed out, probably the best way to bootstrap this is |
6 |
> to offer tarballs of a shallow repository and a full repository. |
7 |
> Perhaps we'd offer the latter as a torrent. The shallow repository |
8 |
> should be light on the CPU too. |
9 |
no. |
10 |
|
11 |
i explicitly said before, there would be two repos: |
12 |
1. main working repo, starts with ONLY initial commit. 40MB pack. |
13 |
2. historical. read-only, you graft it to history to use. |
14 |
|
15 |
BOTH of these would have preferred download via git-bundle over |
16 |
HTTP/rsync. historical would NOT be available via clone due to cputime |
17 |
hit. |
18 |
|
19 |
please look up git-bundle before suggesting things like tarballs of |
20 |
repos/checkouts. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
24 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
25 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
26 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |