Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego \\\"Flameeyes\\\" Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:52:40
Message-Id: 200504062350.44753@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed by Luca Barbato
1 On Wednesday 06 April 2005 23:08, Luca Barbato wrote:
2 > If GNU sed is better than the one provided by the system and the
3 > provided one doesn't have other extensions not covered by GNU sed then
4 > the simplest and better solution is replace the native with the improved.
5 I don't like to replace system utilities when they are different from the GNU
6 ones. So i don't like to replace tar with gnu tar, sed with gnu sed, and so
7 on, because they are not completely compatible.
8 If gsed was only a super-set of sed, it could be possible, but it isn't.
9 Scripts may rely on the original behaviour.
10
11 --
12 Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
13 http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/