Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept
Date:	Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:30:26
Message-Id:	`20120907192308.2ffb48da@googlemail.com`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept by Zac Medico

1	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2	Hash: SHA1
3
4	On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:18:28 -0700
5	Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
6	> In the linked chromium-os-dev discussion, the consensus seemed to be
7	> that migrating deps from DEPEND to HDEPEND would result in fewer
8	> overall changes than migrating deps from DEPEND to TDEPEND. For this
9	> reason, the dominant preference was to go with HDEPEND.
10
11	They're looking at "minimum number of changes to make it appear to
12	work", not "minimum number of changes to express dependencies
13	correctly".
14
15	- --
16	Ciaran McCreesh
17	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18	Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
19
20	iEYEARECAAYFAlBKO44ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHGDwCgi66mZCVH0UWdB8yfJxl8lcuR
21	QPkAnRgziWGLpMbJ1i92CXjRJ1Q2tWzJ
22	=S+jv
23	-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----