Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matti Bickel <mabi@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] RFC: per package eclass GLEP
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:07:42
I'm a couple weeks late with this, but here goes:
from my failed attempts at reviving GLEP33 grow a discussion with
ferringb on IRC about how to get what I wanted anyway :)

We agreed that having eclasses specific to a package located someplace
near the actual ebuilds was beneficial and should be supported by PMs
somehow. Someplace and somehow are specified along some other details in
the attached proposed GLEP.

I'm posting this for review by the wider community, at the same time
asking the GLEP editors (antarus? pva?) for guidance on the formalities.
I gather the GLEP should get a number and be uploaded in CVS somewhere,
as well as appear on the GLEP project page.

So, yeah, what do you think? Is it worth it? Can the draft be improved?
I'm specifically interested in the amount of work involved in supporting
something like the thing laid out in the GLEP in our current PMs.


File name MIME type
glep-62.txt text/plain
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: per package eclass GLEP "Paweł Hajdan
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: per package eclass GLEP Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: per package eclass GLEP "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: per package eclass GLEP Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>