| 1 |
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. posted on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:04:03 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 6/21/10 8:53 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On 21 June 2010 11:43, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
>>>> introspection: Add gobject-introspection support, allowing for the |
| 7 |
>>>> dynamic generation of bindings for various languages |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
>>> gobject-introspection ? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
>> exceedingly verbose |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> "introspection" is similarly too general. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
gobj-bindings ? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Bindings is a common enough term in use flag descriptions, etc, that users |
| 18 |
should at least have an idea what it means. Introspection? Not so much. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Or perhaps dyn-bindings ? As a kde user without gnome merged, however, |
| 21 |
I'd prefer gobj-bindings, tho, as it's a better memory prompt to what it's |
| 22 |
related to, and that I'll likely want it off. It should work similarly |
| 23 |
for gnome users who'll likely want it on. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 27 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 28 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives