Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:45:41
Message-Id: 20080614194537.cf4449fd.genone@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees by Patrick Lauer
1 On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:32:22 +0000
2 Patrick Lauer <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org> wrote:
3
4 > Portage 2.2 and others support sets, portage 2.2 even supports
5 > dynamic sets like the "@preserved-rebuild". Shouldn't be that hard to
6 > add a "live-ebuilds" dynamic set.
7 > (Comments on the feasibility of my idea from portage people
8 > appreciated)
9
10 Should be simple if there is a definite way to determine if an ebuild
11 is a 'live' eubild or not, wether that's by examining the
12 name/category/version/metadata/external list/moon phase doesn't really
13 matter (well, moon phase might complicate it a bit ;)
14
15 Marius
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list