1 |
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Kristian Fiskers |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> By all means, thanks for informing about an alternative, but I |
5 |
> personally believe that it is important for the overall distribution |
6 |
> to keep a wider perspective than personal non-free use (even if this |
7 |
> is a developers primary focus as reason for contribution), otherwise |
8 |
> we'll hit a wall quickly enough. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> In this specific case I at least use pdftk for some batch jobs on |
11 |
> business-related servers and a non-commercial license would not be |
12 |
> viable. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
pdfTK is also GPLv2, (effectively GPLv3 since iText is /A/GPLv/3/? |
16 |
Effectively AGPLv3 when in a public-facing service?) unless you're paying |
17 |
for it. I doubt m-click would refuse to consider alternative paid licensing |
18 |
if they were asked. |